Critique on SGPolCom’s 4-part “Stop At Two” policy analysis
I refer to the series of four articles [1], [2], [3], [4] by SGPolCom: [1] A History of Singapore’s Population Control, 1947 ~ 2001 [2] The effects of the population ‘disincentives’ policies [3] Population ‘Disincentives’ Policies – A Factual Breakdown [4] Stop blaming the ‘STOP AT TWO’ policy In its first...
The heart of the matter
An old, mad, blind, despised, and dying king,-- Princes, the dregs of their dull race, who flow Through public scorn,--mud from a muddy spring,-- Rulers who neither see, nor feel, nor know, But leech-like to their fainting country cling, Till they drop, blind in blood, without a blow,-- A people starved and stabbed in the untilled...
Is there such a thing as too much consultation?
It is interesting how the government failing to hold the commanding height on the blogosphere and the Internet showed resilience which had they applied an ounce of it to look after the interests and welfare of the people would render all opposing political parties obsolete. Singapolitics is the ruling party's latest attempt...
|
|
|
|
|
- PAP IBs are the betrayers on The fate of Singapore
- PAP mandate strong on America humiliated as Biden shunted at APEC Summit
- PAP mandate strong on America humiliated as Biden shunted at APEC Summit
- Singaporeans R Free Riders on Good Governance
- Singaporeans R Free Riders on Good Governance
|