The Rule of Law and the Paradox of the AIM Transaction 4
Part 4 – Town Councils Are Apolitical Entities Contrary to what Baey Yam Keng and Khaw Boon Wan claim, I have made clear that the Town Councils are apolitical entities under the Town Councils Act (Cap. 329A) in Part 1. This is aligned with the same reason that Khaw Boon Wan, being the Minister for National Development, cannot...
The Rule of Law and the Paradox of the AIM Transaction 3
Part 3 – Misleading Parliament The Ministerial Statement on Town Councils on 13 May 2013 initiated a 4-hour parliamentary debate of the AIM transaction. Khaw Boon Wan, Ministerial Statement, 13 May 2013 15. In line with this objective, the MND crafted the legislation to recognise the political nature of TCs. As the Review...
The Rule of Law and the Paradox of the AIM Transaction 2
Part 2 – Conflict of Interest The MND Town Council Review Report (TCRR) on the AIM Transaction was released on 3 May 2013. There is consensus that the TCRR has failed in several key areas. However, I shall only address the conflict of interest issue. AIM Pte Ltd was set up in 1991 by the PAP (Section 9, TCRR), and wholly-owned...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 老人王 (LaoRen Wang) on Top wishes for 2025?
- 娘希匹 on Leave no man behind
- Trump Strategy on The clock is ticking
- ClapX on Unknown Virus Rampages in China; Hospitals Utterly Overwhelmed
- You die your buiness on Leave no man behind
|
|