Ministerial salary should not be pegged to top 500/501 income earners, time for review
Singaporeans should not fear scrutinizing PAP and start to ask hard questions. When PAP tells us that “the current total annual salary of an entry level Minister (i.e. MR4) is benchmarked to 60% of the median income of the top 1,000 earners who are Singapore Citizens”, they are only trying to confuse and obfuscate. Fact: PAP...
Being punitive permeates every aspect of Singapore’s public services
From the way a disabled >senior citizen was callously denied aid from the government to how ex offenders are treated upon release after serving their time make one thing very clear. Every aspect of our government ranging from aid to rehabilitation is very punitive in nature. Do we agree with this approach? Is this approach...
Non-existent GST subsidy helps PAP gain some political mileage
Singaporeans have been fooled by PAP for decades. One of the ways is through various non-existent grants/subsidies, eg healthcare GST subsidy. For basic commodities, medical and healthcare services, education and certain food items, GST is exempted in many countries except probably only in Kiasuland. For example, medical...
|
|
|
|
|
- 老人王 (LaoRen Wang) on Top wishes for 2025?
- 娘希匹 on Leave no man behind
- Trump Strategy on The clock is ticking
- ClapX on Unknown Virus Rampages in China; Hospitals Utterly Overwhelmed
- You die your buiness on Leave no man behind
|