
Parti Liyani retried and convicted in Parliament?
As promised in October, Law Minister Shanmugam delivered a statement in Parliament yesterday on the Parti Liyani case. I have previously written extensively about it here, here, here and here. Despite naive hopes expressed by many Singaporeans that the flaws exposed by the Parti Liyani case should lead to reform of the...

Satisfied with K. Shanmugam’s explanations about the Parti Liyani’s theft case in Parliament
As a citizen, I am pleased and satisfied with K. Shanmugam's explanations about the Parti Liyani's theft case in Parliament yesterday. I find his explanations thorough and professional, however, I have 2 humble points to offer. The 2 public prosecutors are now subject of AGC's internal investigations and among other issues....

Did Law Minister make a veiled threat in Parliament to the person who helped draft Parti Liyani’s complaint?
I was watching CNA News last night when Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam made a strange remark which appear to me to be a veiled threat. The Minister was asked by Leader of the Opposition (LO) Pritam Singh about Ms Parti Liyani’s complaint of 3 July – which was republished by HOME yesterday (4 Nov). One of the areas...
|
|
|
|
- SINGAROAR on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Papa PARDON Son Democracy SRFR on 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲
- Papa PARDON Son Democracy SRFR on We see it not by their words but by their actions
- Papa PARDON Son Democracy SRFR on 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲
- Longkang Undiscerning sotong on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
|