include("cmp.php");
Archive for the ‘Policies’ Category
Roy: PAP must be transparent and accountable to SGs

Roy: PAP must be transparent and accountable to SGs

Photo credit: Yawning Bread (Alex Au) Desmond Lee, It is the PAP Which Needs to Be Transparent and Accountable to Singaporeans for Our CPF Dear Desmond, I read your latest statement on the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC). You said, "AHPETC has yet to explain its serious financial mismanagement, and the... 

吕德耀的温馨提醒 — 大佬,是时候提高车资了

吕德耀的温馨提醒 — 大佬,是时候提高车资了

怪事各地都有,新加坡却特别的多!越南旅客这么一跪,竟然跪出了包青天,八个便衣到“黑店”大事搜索,提走了好多证物。只是,不要说“黑店”不只一家,毒瘤不仅一个 — 只因为有部长就放过话,对付“黑森林”的嚣张还需另立新法。 这么一来,这八个警察就变得好尴尬。不是吗?一来新法未立,搜索调查“依”的可是“何法”?二来嘛,这个就更难说话。因为如果今日的行动若是“有法”可“依”的话,那么执法为何如此姗姗来迟,内幕可有什么“碗糕”(猫腻)? 嗨,说起了“黑森林”,所有的新加坡人,如果身边就有个“地洞”或窟窿什么的,倒不如立即藏身进取去的好,因为“黑森林”的大龙头,“黑店”的始作俑者,就是我们“依法治国”的政府,这说起来真是“羞”煞人。 你道这是为什么吗?原来“黑店”诳人,还需的你自己本身“白纸黑字”在买卖合约签个姓名才行。警察来了,这个“白纸黑字”就显示出了“合法”的权利。这也是为什么这么多年来,警察和消费者协会所以无所作为、“黑森林”所以“逍遥法内”的原因。 “黑店”依“法”行事,走的还是法律漏洞。然而,政府自身要做“黑店”,却是更为方便,只要“出条”法律就行。不是吗?赌博是够“黑”的吧?政府大笔一挥,给个营业执照就这样被“漂白”了。 真正说起来,政府最最“黑”的,就是公积金这一项。如果以“朝令夕改”来形容,一点儿也不为过。这几年来,自从在第二次世界大战之后的婴儿潮出生的国人都达到了“领取”公积金存款的年龄之后,“老人”突然就变成了问题... 

CPF: Focus groups not very focused?

CPF: Focus groups not very focused?

CPF focus group We refer to the article “CPF focus group: Hopes for more certainty, simpler system” (Channel NewsAsia, Nov 15). 10 focus group discussions?  It states that “The CPF Advisory Panel held its first public focus group discussion on Saturday (Nov 15) to seek views on enhancing the CPF system. The panel will... 



Official Quick Links
Members LoginContact UsSupport Us
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Announcement

UA-67043412-1