
CPF: A Legal Conjecture
CPF: A Legal Conjecture The writer felt compelled to pen this article as a follow up to “Ministry of Finance contradicts Minister of Finance” (https://www.tremeritus.net/2014/07/14/ministry-of-finance-contradicts-minister-of-finance/) in light of some important legal perspective that emerged. These views provide new angles...

CPF – All talks lead to Rome
So many ministers have spoken about the CPF. They appeared to be saying different things. On close analysis, they all points to one direction, they are not going to return your CPF at 55 or 65 in one lump sum, or a meaningful sum. And what do these mean? Why are they so adamant to hold back your CPF despite the public expression...

Temasek: Over $35b injections from Govt – No CPF?
We refer to the article “Sources of $5b funds to Temasek revealed” (Straits Times, Jul 9). Alas! We know exactly where the $5b injection into Temasek came from? It states that “Temasek had disclosed on Tuesday that it received a $5 billion capital injection from the Finance Ministry during its latest financial year ended...
|
|
|
|
- StayTuned Sim Ann on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Fearing Monsters on Fear-Mongering Over Tariff Fallout Rings Hollow Without Hard Data
- Voice for Change on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Untouchable Rich on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Who would be Real MPs on 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲
|