include("cmp.php");
Archive for the ‘Policies’ Category
Strange replies in Parliament? Part 5

Strange replies in Parliament? Part 5

20% of families on ComCare assistance saw incomes rise beyond eligibility criteria. I refer to the article “20% of families on ComCare assistance saw incomes rise beyond eligibility criteria” (Channel NewsAsia, Nov 12). 3 in 4 found jobs? It states that “About three in four unemployed Singaporeans under ComCare’s Short... 

政府忌讳“贫穷线”出台后 几十万穷人立即成为烫手山芋

政府忌讳“贫穷线”出台后 几十万穷人立即成为烫手山芋

Life is a struggle for many in SG. 为什么《定贫穷线不实际》,在探讨李总理说出这般废话,却没有“实际”的行动来解决生活在新加坡社会底层的贫困大众的政策出台前,让我们来看看社会及家庭发展部长陈振声的鸟话...噢,不!是“名人语录”来怎样推诿、推卸应有的政治责任。 “有心者不会局限讨论一条线还是几条线,而是在不管有几条线的情况下都上前出一把力,也愿意了解我们如何建立制度,照顾国人。” 我说陈振声天才白痴,可见一点儿都没有冤枉了他。在一条线都还没有影子,镜子里没有花,水面上没有月。这时候谈什么“在不管有几条线的情况下都上前出一把力”--... 

No need poverty line: But many needy students not helped?

No need poverty line: But many needy students not helped?

Kueh lapis I refer to the article “PM: We don’t need poverty line to help the poor” (Sunday Times, Nov 17). Don’t need poverty line? It states that “Singapore is past the point where a poverty line is useful, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong indicated yesterday, as its groups of needy now take shifting and multi-faceted... 



Official Quick Links
Members LoginContact UsSupport Us
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Advertisement

Announcement

UA-67043412-1