So many unanswered questions on AIM-PAP
This is a response to the 26-paragraph, four-page statement given by Dr Teo Ho Pin, the informal coordinating chairman of PAP town councils, who gave this explanation in a statement outlining why and how the town councils came to have a sale and lease back deal with the PAP-owned Action Information Management (Aim). The statement...
S$25,030 Dollar Question on AIM Scandal
The $25,030 Dollar Question still unanswered about the AIM scandal: Why? Why do the deal at all? Why sell public property into party political hands for a pitance? Teo Ho Pin and the PAP have been scratching around in a state of panic to justify the deal that has had Singaporean's scratching their heads for weeks. On releasing...
$2.05M EC Penthouse – A Case of No Winners?
Over the weekend, you might have heard about a $2.05 million Executive Condominium being sold in a scant 2 hours after booking began at 10am. This has certainly created quite a buzz. Some questioned the high price, while others were shocked with the size and overt luxury afforded in the public housing sphere, all subsidised...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- SINGAROAR on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Papa PARDON Son Democracy SRFR on 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲
- Papa PARDON Son Democracy SRFR on We see it not by their words but by their actions
- Papa PARDON Son Democracy SRFR on 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲
- Longkang Undiscerning sotong on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
|
|