Why should Singpaoreans and PRs be lumped together for employment statistics?
Why did the government lump Singaporeans and PRs together when tabulating statistics for local employment? So as not to pit Singaporeans against PRs? Obviously not. I believe the most probable reason for lumping these two components together is to confuse the populace regarding the actual number of employment created for native...
We can get you the numbers, but you don’t need to know
I refer to this article on Today. Basically, in Parliament on 6th January, the PAP declared that Singaporeans are getting more jobs, 60,000 local employment. Mr Pritam Singh requested for the specific number in terms of PRs and Singaporeans. However, Mr Chan Chun Sing vehemently refused to answer that question. 1) Mr Chan deflected...
Thank you, Dr. Chee!
Even though we are a democratic country, Singaporeans have lost the basic right to question the government which we had voted in. We have many questions on the PAP’s nonsense, and we demand answers on CECA, CPF, Mrs. Pinky’s salary, etc. Of course, many Singaporeans were coerced into voting for PAP as they painted a very...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- PAP mandate strong on Trump is making America hate more than great.
- Pappies on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Joker on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Absurdity on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Don't scared vote out papucks on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
|
|