So many holes in the statements in Parliament? (Part 4)
I refer to the article “Oxley Road: Conflict of interest accusations unfounded, says SMS Indranee” (Straits Times, Jul 4). It states that “Concluding, Ms Indranee said that Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling have “made plenty of allegations but we have not seen any substance and no evidence”. “I’m sure the MPs...
FamiLee feud: What should have happened in the Parliament
The Opposition Party should have thoroughly questioned the accused, in this case: the Prime Minister. Since all these allegations come with supporting evidence, the Opposition Party should have also tabled a non-confidence motion in the PM. Since the party whip had been lifted, members of the ruling party could choose side....
Right platform to explain himself?
PM Lee has voiced out the clearest reason yet on why he needed to bring the family dispute of Oxley Road into Parliament. In Singapore's context, the role of Prime Minister is the person who commands the confidence of the majority of MPs, if not all. That is why as PM he has a duty to all MPs to respond to the allegations thrown...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 东古斯坦 on Singaporeans going to the polls on 3rd May 2025
- 多党是乱像的开始！ on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- PAP mandate strong on Chaos in China as extreme storm destroys homes and cars
- PAP mandate strong on Chaos in China as extreme storm destroys homes and cars
- 88 million dollars on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
|
|