AIM – a model for control by PAP assuming it loses GE one fine day
The present saga - in the ability of a $2 Company owned by the PAP being able to undermine the workings of the AHTC managed by WP - should be a wake-up call to all Singaporeans. It is amazing that the PAP should allow itself to be exposed in this sordid arrangement using PUBLIC FUNDS - accumulated in the 14 PAP Town Councils...
More opposition in parliament, more transparency and accountability for S’poreans
With the delayed response about the AIMs saga, it has brought about a heightened awareness, that if Singaporeans vote for more opposition to get into parliament, we get more transparency that we have been asking for. Till today, PAP does not provide much answer and all their MP’s and ministers seem silent, it seems like they...
AIM- a commercial or political entity?
Mr Teo can explain all he wants but the crux of the matter from how I see it is simply this: To sell the software to a $2 company that has the explicit discretion whether or not to provide the license of the software to a town council simply on the basis of a significant change in the membership of the council obviously...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- PAP mandate strong on Trump is making America hate more than great.
- Pappies on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Joker on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Absurdity on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
- Don't scared vote out papucks on Singapore Needs a Dynamic Multi-Party System
|
|