TR EMERITUS

Social inequality manifests in more than one way. Roads are very well built in Singapore. With fewer cars on the road, traffic is one of the smoothest in any large city I have been. Parking is also plentiful even in relatively plentiful even in the city. This means that the people rich enough to buy cars enjoy a far better experience in transportation. Smooth traffic. Good roads. Plentiful parking. In the meantime, those who cannot afford cars have to take public transport. Perversely, in countries with bad traffic , everyone suffers equally. In Bangkok, whether you are in a taxi or a Rolls Royce, you are stuck in traffic. It’s BETTER to take a tuk tuk or the train. The cheaper option is perversely the better option. Again perversely, this is equalising. In London, even the rich parks and rides to the centre. Because parking in the city is impossible. Less traffic makes for a more efficient economy. Productivity is lost in jams. But there is also equity. Right now, the scales are too heavily tipped towards those who can afford cars. Better to quickly implement ERP 2.0 , let more people own cars , and charge everyone according to usage. Alternatively, restrict private transport to certain lanes. Let more people own cars. Taxis and public transport have their own lanes which less traffic. The current situation is untenable. I say this as a car owner.   Facebook post by Calvin Cheng    Read More →

Around 12-years ago, I made the decision to get married to a Vietnamese girl that I was seeing on an off-and-on basis. It was a decision that went against what “conventional’ Singapore expected of someone like me but at the same time, its proven to be one of the most educational experiences of my life. Let’s start with the “controversy.” I am a Singapore Chinese Graduate working in a professional service. I belong to the segment of Singapore society that is expected to stick to its own kind (same ethnic, educational and professional background). The only sort of exception to this would be to marry an “Ang Moh” (white) girl. As far as “respectable” Singapore society is concerned, only “blue collar losers” marry girls from poorer parts of Asia and get screwed for it. I’ve get reminded of this fact when some of the “cultured” people online have decided to comment on my pieces. I won’t pretend that my marriage with Huong has been smooth sailing. We are from different worlds and we’ve had our fights. However, whatever quarrels we may have had, we’ve always found a way back to each other and we’ve been doing so for the last 12-years. Give me a chance to go back to that moment when I decided to get married to her and the answer will always be the same. One of the things about her that keeps me going back to her is the fact that she’s smart. Whatever she may lack in formal education, she more than makes up for it in street-smarts. She won’t be able to tell you about Shakespeare or Bach but she’s also not going to fall for a horseracing scam because some worm looked pretty and flattered her (if anything, she’d feed the worm to the fish). I’ve known far better educated women (professional qualifications from nothing less than NUS) and years of work experience as a working professional who have fallen for the most obvious scams, which is something she would NEVER fall for. I also find her determination for get ahead very sexy. Her most recent venture was to take part in a Beauty Contest. Put her heart and soul into it and ended up wining the Singapore version of this contest. I was really happy for her win and ironically in her moment of glory, I became part of the support staff. One of the jokes being that after years of writing press releases and putting people in the media, I ended up as the husband of a woman who had a press release written about her and got my media appearance as her husband: While I was really happy (to the point of thanking the Almighty in public) with her Singapore win, I thought her moment would end there. If you study the history of beauty contest, you’ll note that Asian girls don’t strike it on the global stage. World Beauty contest tend to be won by South Americans and World Modelling contest won by Eastern Europeans. However, since she was supposed to go, Kiddo and I prayed for her and did our part to support her ambitions. Well, guess what? She actually pulled it off and won her contest on the global stage. OK, I am biased for her and I am sure that there will be plenty of voices about how this was not a mainstream beauty contest and its something minute on the scale of things. However, let’s put things into perspective. This is a girl from a Vietnamese “Home Town,” which translates into a rural village in the middle of nowhere. She’s not the most educated person and yet, at the age of 42, this girl from a Vietnamese village has made her mark on a global platform. Think about it for the moment. How many of us with our superior education and world-wide connectivity in Singapore have ever dreamt of doing anything on the global stage? I actually blame Lee Kuan Yew, our political rock-star for this. I remember watching videos of him talking about how Singapore simply didn’t have the economies of scale to do things big and somehow everyone believed him. Joseph Schooling and the late Sim Wong Hoo aside, how many Singaporeans do anything outside Singapore? Sure, we have a few how become senior corporate leaders in the Asia-Pacific region of a multinational. However, doing things on a global scale is a different matter. Among my family contacts, I can only think of Tham Khai Meng, former Global Creative Head at Ogilvy & Mather. For me personally, I don’t think as “big” as she does. Sure, I think of things outside Singapore, like India or the Middle East or even Africa. I like the fact people from the US and Europe read my blog. However, I’ve not dared to “compete” on a global stage, which she has. People look at me and her and think that I might have “married down,” because she’s less educated and from Vietnam. However, if you look at what she’s dared to achieve and what I’ve dared, you got to question – who really married down?   Tang Li *Although I’ve been based mainly in Singapore for nearly two decades, I’ve had the privilege of being able to meet people who have crossed borders and cultures. I’ve befriended ministers and ambassadors and worked on projects involving a former head of state. Yet, at the same time, I’ve had the privilege of befriending migrant labourers and former convicts. All of them have a story to tell. All of them add to the fabric of life. I hope to express the stories that inspire us to create life as it should be.    Read More →

Everynight just about midnight, thousands of Filipinos scavenge municipal and various thrash collection sites to pick chicken pieces left over by diners. They literally pick from garbage bins and bags. The sources are food courts and restaurants, particularly fast food chains like Jollybee, McDonalds, KFC etc. These pickers haul their collection home where it is sorted. Chicken bones always have a sliver of meat left on them. Bones without meat are disposed. Those with meat are sold to vendors who operate ramshackle food stalls outside their abode. The vendors thoroughly wash the pieces to get rid of dirt and smell. The messy chicken pieces are deep-fried and cooked in the style of calderata with lots of tomato sauce and whatever codiments. Some housewives buy the washed chicken to cook it themselves. Filiinos call this dish pagpag. Customers are neighborhood families or workers who can only afford this dish sold at a fraction of the cost of a proper fresh meal. There has been no reported deaths from consumption of pagpag. Folks say it is actually delicious. These are people who cannot afford a proper meal at Jollybee, the cheapest of the fast food chains. 30% of Filipinos live below poverty line, many live on a single meal a day. Things are so bad that pagpag customers often come with their own home-cooked ‘kanin’ (cooked rice) just to save a few pesos. It is a crying shame for the government and the world to allow people to fall to this level of indignity of consuming repurposed or recycled food. In 2020, Zurich and New York had a per capita income of US$80,000, London had US$50,000 and Singapore had US$65,000. So congratulations, the government has taken the Lion City to amongst the top riches city in the world. Whilst the government has planned and worked their brains out, paying the best amongst them astronomical salaries, to make it to the class of richest cities, it failed miserably on the flip side. Singapore is now the most expensive city in the world. What is the impact and ramification for Singapore as the cost of living defies the law of gravity. First and foremost, gentrification, occurs. Services, investments, infrastructure and real estate development flow with the wealth, changing urban landscape and services. The unwary does not see the creeping changes, thinking it’s just modernisation. There is the overflow of traffic at the special VIP Terminal for private-owned and chartered flights at Changi Airport. The answer is a Seletar Airport dedicated to these private jets. Transformation of whole streets take place to align entertainment and food to the well heeled, witness places like Arab Street, Christia Ong’s Dempsey Road, Holland Road, many streets in China town, etc. Buildings around MRT stations give way to posh private condominiums. A housing crisis is inevitable. Singapore in fact seems on the verge, if not already, at the beginning of a housing crisis. The government insists housing remains affordable by parading subsidies and country comparatives. Indeed, some country comparatives has Singapore at number 1 in housing affordability. But cross-country comparatives are always fraught with parameters unexplained. In this case, two ugly thumbs stick out - the numerator and denominator in computing the affordability index are stacked in Singapore's favour. First, the numerator. Singapore ‘affordable’ houses are all lesser of 99 year leases which has a lower pressure on costs. Second, ‘mean family income’, the denominator, is tricky because Singapore family units often have dual or more family nucleus which reports a much higher mean income. Unlike other cities with housing crisis, the poorest of the poor can somehow find shelter somewhere, even moving into city slums or move to the villages. The tightly controlled Singapore offers no refuge other than to depend on the government. No doubt the HDB has a cheap rental scheme for families caught in such a situation if they qualify the strict criteria. However, in a housing crisis, demand will far outstrip supply. Small retail shopkeepers are left by the wayside and big store operators proliferate with brands like Fairprice, Giant, Prime, Mustafa. Shengsiong, Cold Storage, etc. The neighborhood hole-in-the wall ‘mama’ or Indian convenience shops have been wiped out long ago, replaced by 711 and Cheers brands. Many small OMO, or one-man-operated food stalls, will be wiped out, to be replaced by those that can operate with a central kitchen and multiple outlets. Many economy food stalls are in fact already operating in this manner. There will be miniaturisation of product offerings, particularly in food items. Instead of 6 in a package, it will be sold individually, coffee sachets will be smaller in size, mini-hamburgers, anyone? This is an economic fact of life. When I went to Philippines decades ago, I was surprised to see many mini products but quickly understood the reason. Miniaturisation disadvantages the poor. It lowers the price of product offering, but increases unit costs to consumers. The rising cost of living accentuated by higher rates in services and GST, are hitting the lower income group hard. These folks put the blame squarely on the government's inability to reign in prices and see the arrogance in the doubling down on rate increases. Whilst the angst of the poor is directed at the government, the rich and upper income, especially the young and better educated professionals whose livelihood has not yet been threatened by CECA, see these as whinings and politics of envy. An infamous 2006 social media quote says it all. Remember “..get out of my elite uncaring face”? It is already evident on the ground but the ruling party is unable to see. There is a class divide between the rich and upper middle class who feels differently from the poor. These different sentiments will lead to social strains in time. How will it manifest? For one, disinterest and unmotivated national servicemen leading to quality issues. Civil disobedience. Emigration. The government spends billions of dollars to attract businesses to relocate to Singapore. Surely one and sundry are well acquainted with the singalong mantra of low taxes, business-friendly government, law and order, good infrastructure, educated workforce, gateway to Asean and China, etc. But at the end of day, cost of operation matters. Being the most expensive city in the world has its consequences. Corporations will relocate out of Singapore if the government fails to reign in cost. There is no escape for those hard-pressed by the high cost of living. Unlike those living in London. New York or Zurich who can relocate to the suburbs or countryside, or a less expensive city, Singaporeans are stuck on the tiny island. A densely populated city with no pressure release valve, something has to crack. It starts with a loss of civility on social media, which is already evident, extending into the physical sphere, physical altercations will increase, frustrations will turn to hostilities towards foreign workers, general deterioration in mental health, and even an increase in suicide cases. Social unrest is a given. This of course has political consequences, sooner or later. In the worst case scenario, well organised and efficient municipal services ensure Singaporeans will not even have access to pag pag when driven to that God-forsaken situation.   Patrick Low * Article first appeared on Down The Rabbit Hole.      Read More →