TR EMERITUS

Tan Chuan-Jin Recently I tweeted about how Georgians in large numbers had protested against their pro-Russian government’s attempt to introduce a bill requiring NGOs and media receiving more than 20% foreign funding to register as “foreign agents” and be subject to restrictions. The BBC report said that the proposed law was modelled on a similar law introduced in 2012 in Russia. However the model could equally well be Singapore’s Foreign Interference and Countermeasures Act (FICA) which in turn undoubtedly drew inspiration from Russia’s law. A few days later I read that Georgia’s government had withdrawn the proposed legislation after huge street protests though the Opposition there had told their supporters not to relax yet as the government would likely try to reintroduce the legislation or something similar by a different route. Of course Singaporeans have never had an independent media since LKY shut down the Singapore Herald and the Eastern Sun in the early 1970s and introduced the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act. The Broadcasting Act similarly gave the government a monopoly of TV and radio and made it an offence to receive foreign broadcasts via a private satellite dish. All media are state media, which is itself a misnomer since all editors and journalists can be hired and fired at the whim of the PAP, which, unlike the Chinese or Soviet Communist Parties, is solely the vehicle of one man and one family, a microcosm of the country which is just a family business. To use state resources to ensure favourable, indeed hagiographic, media coverage and to denigrate, belittle or destroy your opponents so you can stay in office and your wife or relatives can continue to enrich themselves on secret remuneration packages is by definition corrupt and has led to prosecutions in several countries with greater checks and balances than Singapore. The trillion dollar question (or $3 trillion question to use my likely extremely accurate estimate of the reserves is why Singaporeans put up with it. As I have shown, every year the Budget is stuffed full of fake spending and tricks to divert Singaporeans’ money into the reserves. Apart from the wholly exceptional year of 2020, the Government takes more from Singaporeans than it gives to the tune of $30 billion or so a year. And that is before gains by Temasek, GIC, MAS and the host of other opaque state owned companies. Unfortunately the quiescence of Singaporeans is mirrored by that of the Opposition MPs they choose to represent them. In this year’s Budget round-up speeches, supposedly neutral but of course PAP Speaker Tan Chuan-Jin praised the Budget debate for being “relatively genteel and civilised” while Indranee regurgitated the usual PAP claptrap about avoiding populism and “the politics of division”. Singaporeans should not be fooled. If the PAP are praising the Opposition for being genteel and civilised it means the Opposition are not doing their job. JBJ was never genteel and civilised. He never shied away from asking hard questions, like the current crop of WP MPs do. I remember him saying, after the PAP appointed him to a committee dealing with the comfort of members that he had been very bad at looking after the comfort of members, all of whom apart from him were PAP at that time. The proof that JBJ did his job well was LHL’s t attack on him in the insulting condolence letter he wrote to my brother and me, accusing JBJ of seeking “by all means to demolish the PAP and our system of government. Unfortunately, this helped neither to build up a constructive opposition nor our Parliamentary tradition” Now we have an Opposition that pride themselves on being “constructive” and seem to want the PAP and LHL’s dynasty to stay in power forever. When the PAP Speaker and the Leader of the House praise the Opposition for being genteel and civilised what they really mean is that the Government has achieved its objective of not being forced to answer any difficult questions or give away any important information, let alone spend more of what should be a mountain of cash on improving peoples’ lives. When we have a Parliamentary Opposition that is intimidated by the PAP and fears losing their exceedingly generous tax-free MPs’ allowances, one that does not want to fulfil the constitutional role of an Opposition within a democracy and hold the Government accountable, that is when Singaporeans get a bad deal. The amount of the reserves goes unchallenged and the PAP get away with inflating the total spending figures in the Budget and diverting them into the reserves through a variety of dirty tricks. LHL’s and Lawrence Wong’s unproven assertions that Singaporeans need to pay more tax go unchallenged or the Opposition go to great lengths to prove that revenue can be raised by other sources, thus validating the PAP paradigm that state resources are almost exhausted due to the demands of feckless and greedy citizens who dare to fall ill or grow old. To take just one example of how ineffectual our Opposition is, it was not until I told Sylvia Lim and Pritam Singh that they should ask a question about Ho Ching’s salary that the WP plucked up courage to do so. Sylvia Lim even tried to argue with me that it was disclosed in the Temasek Holdings Annual Review. Even then they failed to ask a direct question instead asking what the remuneration of the top three management was. They were far too easily fobbed off with contempt by Lawrence Wong who said that Temasek was a private company and having done what they felt was their duty promptly sat down and have not raised the issue since. WP have accepted the role that Indranee outlined for them in her speech, of “reflecting genuine ground concerns”, nothing more. Singaporeans need to be less genteel and civilised and more like Georgians in demanding the truth from their Government and refusing to put up with repressive laws designed to entrench the PAP in power. and keep their leaders, spouses and relatives monopolising the top jobs and paying themselves billions while lying to the people about the resources available. I promise that if elected to Parliament I will, like my father, be neither genteel nor civilised but instead be dogged in pursuit of the truth, no matter the cost.   Kenneth Jeyaretnam   About the author: I’m a Singaporean economist who became an opposition activist. I blog to provide an alternative to the porkies that the Pinkies tell. It just so happens that my alternative is the truth. That’s why I’ve never been sued in any civil or criminal court no matter how hard hitting my criticism. I’m quoted and interviewed and asked to speak across the world but largely censored in Singapore in an effort to silence my political opinions. The left hate me because they think I split their vote and because I eschew their outmoded economic models. Models that don’t work. The Right and the Conservatives hate me because I’m a liberal. I’m not sure what the middle think of me. I don’t think there are more than a handful of people in the middle, here in Singapore. I’m a Singaporean born and bred, dual heritage, my parents Singaporean established here before the State of Singapore was created. I’m not Eurasian. I read economics at Cambridge and could be broadly described as from the Keynesian school but I believe in interventions. I was formerly a successful hedge fund manager. After economics and politics my greatest interests are history, film and Makan. I run but I run so I can eat like a Singaporean.      Read More →

I refer to the Editorial of the Straits Times, “Between China and the US: New dynamics, new paths, same balance” (May 1). Since centuries ago, there were imminent, significant differences in the direction, conception or philosophy of the country’s administration and governance between the United States and China. These scenarios will remain for the present and the future. Since China’s emergence, China has been consistently focusing upon its country’s internal administration and governance. These, obviously include China’s economic developments, the well-being of its people, the political and social stability, the modernisation of its agriculture, industry, national defence, and science and technology. In reverse, the United States of America has been actively pursuing to be the greatest/top hegemony immediately after the World War II. It had started intervened the internal affairs and undermined unity and sovereignty of other countries. For examples, USA initiated or waged war in 1)Korean Peninsula War from 1950 to 1953, 2)The Vietnam War from 1955 to 1975 (More than 3 million people (including over 58,000 Americans) were killed in the Vietnam War, and more than half of the dead were Vietnamese civilians), 3) The War in Afghanistan was an armed conflict from 2001 to 2021. It began when an international military coalition led by the United States launched an invasion of Afghanistan, toppling the Taliban-ruled Islamic Emirate and establishing the internationally recognized Islamic Republic three years later. 4)Iraq War from 20 March 2003 to 18 December 2011. US waged invasion and occupation of Iraq. Overthrow of Ba’ath Party government and execution of Saddam Hussein in 2006. All the above wars have clearly expounded the ambitions of USA’s invasion and hegemony. The hidden ultimate motives of US are aiming for selling its weapons and military equipment, reverse flow of funds/capital and seizure of fuel from its invasions. The recent years, US has taken China as its strongest competitor and virtual rival. This type of jealousy and “psychological imbalance” have clearly reflected in respective spectrum. For examples, the US administration often stirs up Taiwan Straits crisis or tensions, by hoping to sell its armaments and military equipment to Taiwan, deploys its military forces in Taiwan and launch warships, aircraft carriers and military aircrafts touring Taiwan Straits as well as intentionally fix up U.S. politicians visit Taiwan to stoke up the indignation of Chinese leadership. Another distinctive confrontation adopted by the US government against China is launching tariff barriers and cracking down China’s technology firms in The United States. Anyway, whatever measures and actions taken by the USA to curb/suppress China’s swift emergence will hardly be successful. As China’s economic success or prosperity is solidly built upon self-reliance, unremitting efforts/strengths to secure consistent improvement and stability. In short, the recent history of China’s prosperity and successful governance have been built upon its capability of applying the traditional Chinese philosophy - the harmony and coordination of Yin and Yang. Needless to say, Singapore, Asean and Europe have the desire for balance between the rival superpowers. Therefore, achieving the meaningful balance of superpowers can only bring the hope of peace to this turbulent world.   Teo Kueh Liang (Mr)      Read More →

This subject has fascinated Sngaporeans for quite some time to the point of ad nauseam. We seldom heard the melliferous baritone of Lawrence Wong before he became DPM. Overnight you can now hear his sermon of the mount almost everyday, to mesmerise his audience the people of Singapore many may be disillusioned to perk them up to meet the worsening geopolitical challenges. In his May Day Rally speech it was obvious he painted a very grim picture of Singaporeans facing one of the worst economic prognostigatioin with complete cessation of affluent western investments. He entreated workers to work their guts out to preserve their livelihood and the government will back them up all the way. How DPM Lawrence Wong and his 4G leadership are going to do it will be something up in the air. Lee Hsien Loong and his millionaire ministers will continue to pocket millions of people's money for their salaries and they will be wallowing in their luxurious livelihood when Singapore is hit by the severe economic crunch. There may be some token relief but distressed workers may have to fend for themselves in the end. Serious deterioration of livelihood and work srtoppages may not be avoided. We can really start to plan by first getting the multi-millionaire Lee Hsien Long and his millionaire ministers to cut their obscene salaries to the level of world leaders like the American President and channel these salary deductions to the workers' relief fund when the economic crisis comes crashing down.The millions of people's money they pay themselves as salaries is a moral decadence.to begin with as even the American President can live on USD 400,000 a year to serve the American public. Why do Lee Hsien Loong and his venal ministers want to do with the millions they coveted in their lifetime when they cannot take it with them to their graves. They will get the most heartfelt gratitude from Singaporeans if they can show some humanity when they are struck by humongous misfortune. We have a defeated minister Ng Chee Meng appointed as Secretary-General of NTUC drawing minister's pay but does not have anything to show.   Yoong Siew Wah * The author was the Director of Singapore’s Internal Security Department (ISD) from 1971 to 1974. He was Director of the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) in the 1960s, and had a distinguished career in the Singapore Special Branch in the 1950s. Mr Yoong has granted TR Emeritus exclusive right to his memoir, to be published on an independent website (work in progress), upon his passing.         Read More →