TR EMERITUS

The latest round of COE bidding again broke record in most categories. Please pardon me for asking if record breaking COE prices is good or bad for our country? Well, I guess that all depends on who that question is asked. To the government, it must be good news because they will again be laughing all the way to the bank. In fact, I believe that it is not an understatement to even say that COE system along with the likes of heavyweight revenue generator such as GST and corporate tax etc is among a major source of government's inland revenue generator. What about the masses, the everyday people? High COE prices must boomerang all around that must result in higher and higher cost of services, higher cost of products and everyday cost of living even for those who do not own any vehicles. One image came to my mind when I composed my commentary and that image is one of a couple of frogs swimming in boiling water. I liken the vast majority of Singaporeans to be those frogs swimming faster and faster in boiling water. They are a pitiful lot and we know what will eventually happen to those frogs. Singaporeans have no courage, no desire and do not recognise the danger or possess the sense of urgency to change their situation which they can if they want it bad enough, ie, through their votes. They would rather suffer in silence, swim faster and faster and see which frog could last longer and which got boiled alive first. I am a native born person but I hate and despise the lack of guts and courage in too many of my fellow citizens. Singaporeans have been too well conditioned in our political eco-system thus blunting their innate survival instincts. In conclusion, our COE system needs tweaking to benefit more working class Singaporeans, arrest it runaway trajectory and financially burdening our citizens in the many years into the future at the expense of many other life's meaningful purposes and pursuits such as having the willingness and courage to get married and having more children etc. The pap government's way of making up for our pathetic, pathetic falling total fertility rate due largely to their flawed policies such as the very expensive cost of living, cost of public housing and the COE price madness is through immigration of foreigners which in my view is lazy, incompetent and short sighted and if not corrected with urgency must ruin our country's future and our young ones. You have been warned. Think.   Simon Lim      Read More →

One of the greatest phenomena of any given society is the ability of the human mind to get past regulations and to even make money from the said regulations. In Singapore, this is most visible in the area of hiring cheap labour from other parts of Asia. Our situation is simple. There are industries like shipping and construction which depend on cheap labour from other parts of Asia. However, there is a quota on how many labourers a company can hire. The idea being that you can’t hire cheap labour from Asia unless you have hired a certain number of Singaporeans. It sounds like the government is doing something to ensure the locals get first pick at jobs. To an extent, it works for small professional firms, which hire a number of locals before moving onto foreigners. However, it’s a different story when it comes to industries like shipping, construction and food. A lot of jobs in these industries are what you call “dangerous” and “dirty” and locals, particularly young graduates shun these jobs regardless of how much is on offer. The quota system has created an industry where the industries that need foreign labour will make “CPF” contributions for local Singaporeans to ensure that they have quota to hire the labourers who are willing to do these jobs. While technically illegal, it’s a money spinner for the government. The local phantom will inevitably have a higher tax bill (to avoid suspicion, one declares the phantom wage as tax – Singapore’s direct taxes being relatively low) and the CPF kitty which is controlled by the government gets filled by workers who may not otherwise had CPF contributions. However, you do get unscrupulous “entrepreneurs” who pay off the “phantom” workers but end up hitting the actual workers with all sorts of fines and fees to an extent when the guys doing the actual work don’t get anything. Then, it reaches a point when the guys who have been screwed complain visibly, thus denting the clean image that the government likes to present: When these things happen, the government will inevitably remind the rest of us not to sell our CPF quota and we are told that “phantom” workers are a social problem. I’m going to leave the phenomena of hiring phantom locals to more intelligent people. I will however, suggests that the government is focused on the wrong phantom worker problem. The serious phantom worker problem that we have in Singapore comes from what I call phantom workers receiving real salaries but real workers receiving phantom salaries. To be fair to the government, its not limited to government. You get this situation in the private sectors. I’m sure that plenty of us have experienced that person who comes into work, plays with his phone for two hours and then leaves. Instead of wondering about that person’s value contribution, the boss starts complaining that the other workers who are actually doing something that can be recognised as work that they’re not doing their part. Ironically, it’s a situation where the guy playing with his phone is earning more than the guys doing work. This is what you might you call a clear-cut case of the phantom worker earning a real salary but the real worker earning a phantom salary (defined as just enough to meet legal requirements without actually taking living expenses or contribution to the company into consideration). Unfortunately, this isn’t something limited to quirky companies in the private sector. If you look at this syndrome, one is bound to suspect that the phantom worker issue goes far deeper than that. Let’s start with the fact that for the longest of times, two thirds of the population were earning below the statistical median wage. Wages at the lower end of the scale were, well pretty low and whenever people said anything about it, the standard reply was that the workers needed to become more productive. You hawker centre aunty for example earns around $1,400 a month (before CPF deduction and this is considered as close to a minimum wage as it gets in Singapore). Nobody doubts that the hawker centre aunty is actually a real worker doing real work (you actually see your tables being wiped and your dirty dishes do get collected). Yet, should your hawker centre aunty find it hard to get buy on S$1,400 a month and ask for S$1,401, she will be undoubtedly scolded in the national media for not being more productive and upgrading herself. Classic example of a real worker earning a phantom wage. However, if you look at the government, you can’t help but feel that we have plenty of phantom workers earning very real wages. We have, for example, five mayors earning on average of S$600,000 a year. Their wages are not exactly phantom like. However, what exactly is the work that they do? If you think about it, Singapore itself is a city. In most nations, the mayor of any given city does the actual work of running the city, pretty much like what our Prime Minister does. However, that’s not exactly the case in Singapore. Our “Mayors” run councils made up of several constituencies, which in turn are run by members of parliament (MP). Clearly, we have a case of a job, which is to all intents and purposes “phantom.” However, the wages are not. Why do we need phantom workers earning real salaries. The purpose of a phantom is phantom and their wages should match. We are constantly reminded that Singapore is a small place with no resources and that we need to conserve what little we had. Surely, addressing the issue as to why phantom workers are earning real salaries and real workers are earning phantom salaries is key part of doing this.   Tang Li *Although I’ve been based mainly in Singapore for nearly two decades, I’ve had the privilege of being able to meet people who have crossed borders and cultures. I’ve befriended ministers and ambassadors and worked on projects involving a former head of state. Yet, at the same time, I’ve had the privilege of befriending migrant labourers and former convicts. All of them have a story to tell. All of them add to the fabric of life. I hope to express the stories that inspire us to create life as it should be.      Read More →

A Chinese music student who graduated from Wuhan Conservatory of Music and currently undergoing her Master's in France. This is JingXuan Peng rendition of Smooth Criminal on the Guzheng.           P/S: Due to the lack of new editorial articles causing most older ones to be archived, this video is inserted to fill up the void.      Read More →