TR EMERITUS

The court has determined that the ex-nurse was paralyzed after taking the vaccination and SGH had terminated her employment after 6 months of half salary arrangement as she could no longer perform the role of a nurse. SGH & MOH scramble to deal with the barrage of criticisms and PR crisis. SGH offered to re- employ the nurse when she recovers while MOH started to put up statistics to show that it has been providing one time off financial assistance to those who are injured by the vaccine (V) and categorically state that the nurse did not apply for it. Let me just dissect this whole mess here: 1) SGH is no ordinary employer. It is a public hospital filled with professionals in medicine! It knows the rules set by MOH very well. 2) Did SGH conclude that the nurse's paralysis is due to her jab? If so, why didn't it help its own employee to apply for the VIFAP? Shouldn't MOH actively engage this nurse since she works right under its umbrella? 3) Or did they insist that her paralysis has nothing to do with the V? If so, do they have any evidence at all that her paralysis is due to other issues and not the jab? 4) V was mandated for all those who worked at the Healthcare Frontline services. Thus, getting injured by V is legitimately considered as work injury. Did SGH offer to compensate the nurse for work injury? 5) MOH puts up the statistics that: a) There were 413 successful VIFAP claims. But it didn't state how many claims were rejected! b) A total of nearly $1.9m were issued out for all 413 claims c) 3 claimants were granted the maximum of $225K 6) Apart from the 3 top claimants, 410 claims shared a total of $1.225m. That will work out to an average of $2988 per claimant! 7) Do you know how big the hassle a claimant has to go through just to get that $2988? As far as I know, most doctors and specialists in SG are extremely reluctant to certify any serious health impacts after V as a result of V injury. It seems that this has become a taboo subject to them. 9) The standard reply for rejection is "there is no evidence that the V cause XXX" etc. 10) Before the report of V causing Myocarditis, all heart issues or heart attacks hours or a couple of days right after V were brushed aside as "no evidence". 11) I do not know what's MOH experts' criteria to certify V injuries. I don't think anyone know other than themselves. But I believe they restrict the health issues to those which are only "officially recognized" but now we know, even Pfizer's secret documents have listed 1291 serious adverse side effects as potential V injuries! 12) In my view, the "experts" seem to hold the view that the V is absolutely safe and only those who are "allergic" to it will suffer V injuries. They just disregarded the whole list of 1291 serious adverse side effects listed in Pfizer's own documents. 13) We must acknowledge the V has certain risks which may include some long term impacts which we do not know yet. It must be communicated to people who are taking the jab. 14) When this V is not totally safe (it has officially 413 V injured with 3 serious ones and many rejected VIFAP claims, this V should not be mandated at all and worse, force people to jab as a job requirement! 15) Under such draconian regime, how could we make an honest assessment of the real individual benefits and risks of the V? 16) Even US CDC has acknowledged the V seems to cause long term health problems to some recipients. They acknowledge the preliminary data shows that Bivalent V may have risk of causing stroke. 17) Countries like UK recently decided to limit V to only elderly and some vulnerable people. 18) SG, along with all the highly V countries are suffering unprecedented PROLONGED consistent Excess Deaths with lots of unknown sudden deaths. 19) All these signals cannot be ignored and MOH may have to REVIEW all the rejected VIFAP claims in accordance to the latest discovery of 1291 serious adverse side effects. 20) MOH can't just continue to deny there is any evidence of great number of V injuries when it is actively denying VIFAP claims or its methodology of determining V injury is narrow! Unlike US, UK or Europe, we don't even have a transparent and open system for people to report adverse events independently! 21) In the spirit of science, if the same V is found to cause strokes in US, it would most probably be the case here. 22) Last but not least, after consulting an HR expert, there is a legitimate case for the nurse to sue SGH for work injury compensation, which has no limits (aka $225K max).   Goh Meng Seng      Read More →

1. Several people in chat groups shared reports and videos of young people who died suddenly a short time after they have been vaccinated. They used the event to imply that they vaccine is harmful to young people. 2. I have seen several dozens of these reports. I am sure that there are many more of these cases that I have not seen. Perhaps, the number of these cases amount to a few thousands. 3. Let us assume that there are 10,000 such cases. If 1 billion young people have been vaccinated, this represents 0.001 % of the cases. It is 1000th of 1%. It is small enough to be insignificant. 4. Even if there are no vaccination, perhaps a similar number would have died from "natural causes". They were not reported previously, because there was no major event that can be used to blame these unexpected deaths. 5. I do not rule out the small possibility that the vaccination could be the cause. But the incidence is too low for me to accept that it is the likely cause. 6. I do not trust our health authority totally, as they may be biased in favor of the vaccine due to the funding by the pharmaceutical industry. However, I trust them more than the "experts" who present an alternative theory against the vaccine.   Tan Kin Lian      Read More →

Tech jobs cuts, other sectors hiring - less than 1 in 10 Jobs Growth was S'porean? Singapore will keep building local tech talent amid job cuts: Josephine Teo (ST, Jan 27) Technology will continue to undergird the growth of Singapore’s economy and create job opportunities despite the ongoing massive tech job cuts around the world, said Minister for Communications and Information Josephine Teo on Thursday. Singapore will also continue to invest in Singaporeans by reskilling and upskilling them for career opportunities in tech, she said, citing opportunities in the development of the green economy. Other sectors ramping up their hiring of tech talent include banking, logistics and accommodation. Mrs Teo was allaying fears that tech opportunities may be dwindling following announcements last week that Microsoft and Amazon had started cutting a total of 28,000 jobs across the globe, citing slowing sales and a possible recession. Comment: Why is it that only the 3rd Quarter Employment Growth has the breakdown into foreign workers and local workers, but there was no breakdown for the 1st 2 Quarters? 3rd Quarter Employment Growth 75,900 (71,100 foreign 93.7%, 4,800 locals 6.3%) https://stats.mom.gov.sg/Pages/Labour-Market-Report-3Q-2022.aspx There is a clue in the Labour Market Report 3rd Quarter 2022 - "With the latest increases, resident employment was 4.4% above its pre-pandemic level, while non-resident employment was still 3.9% below its pre-pandemic level". 2019 (pre-pandemic) workforce statistics: 2,355,300 locals (62.3%) (S'poreans %?) 1,422,700 foreign (37.7%) 3,778,000 total https://www.mti.gov.sg - 2019 - Ch2_AES2019 Then, working backwards - to derive an estimate of the breakdown of the 1st 3 Quarters' 2022 Employment Growth of 201,900, into foreign workers (91%) and locals (9%). Since locals are S'poreans & PRs - the percentage of the Jobs Growth that went to S'poreans may be less than 9%. Another way of looking at it, may be that less than 1 in 10 Jobs Growth in the 1st 3 Quarters 2022, may have gone to S'poreans?   Leong Sze Hian      Read More →