TR EMERITUS

These are the QUIET CHANGE of narratives from US and UK government with regards to the Holy Vaccine (V)! There are great amount of studies, researches and data analysis which have run contrary to their past FALSE CLAIMS about the Holy V, so much so that they could no longer maintain their positions. They claim the Holy V is safe and the S proteen will not stay in the body for long but this has been proven wrong and false! Studies have shown these S proteen could stay in the body for weeks and months! They claim the Holy V is safe for pregnant women and those on breastfeeding but huge amount of data and studies have proven otherwise. Raw data on still birth, premature miscarriages, perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality are showing very worrying signals. This is why UK is withdrawing their scientifically baseless claim that the Holy V is safe for pregnant women and breastfeeding women. Click to enlarge At the very least, US and UK gov have the moral courage to back track and correct themselves. Denmark gov has even stop the Holy V for those below 18 years old! The collapse of past false narratives is imminent. The persistent Excess Deaths, rise in ambulance calls and rise in Cancer plus other health issues among population are just too glaring to ignore. We can do nothing when most gov and vaccinated people are living in self denial. We can only pray.   Goh Meng Seng      Read More →

John Drysdale was more scholarly in his presentation in his magnum opus Singapore:Struggle for Success whereas Dennis Bloodworth was more down- to- earth in portraying the clandestine conspiracy of the communist underground and United Front and the internecine srtruggle between the PAP leadership headed by Lee Kuan Yew and the Communist United Front (CUF) led by Lim Chin Siong for supremacy in achieving political power. It is really amazing how Bloodworth could have access to so secretive and revealing of the communist underground and CUF blueprint for the capture of the PAP moderate leadership and the political power of establishing a communist government. Bloodworth was able to narrate it in such an animated and intimated form as if vicariously and tinged with a tad of humour and cynicism here and there which gives the reader a sense of mystique in imbibing it. Lee Hsien Loong was still sucking his mother's milk when all this was happening. He and his mercenary cohorts will simply melt into oblivion if face with such a gargantuan communist avalanche. Civil servants like us were in the front line fighting the communists and ambitious politicians like Lee Kuan Yew and his and his gallant cavaliers were just no match for Lim Chin Siong who commanded the Chinese mass and would have been likely to be gobbled by Lim and his communist combatants. It was a very courageous saviour Chief Minister Lim Yew Hock who ordered a devastating swoop with Special Branch as his hatchet man on the communist revolutionaries that paved the way for Lee Kuan Yew to redeem his ambition. Dr. Toh Chin Chye and Dr. Goh Keng Swee were quick to acknowledge the great favour that Lim Yew Hock had so nobly given them but Lee Kuan Yew was typical in his reluctance and may be still in a daze. Lee Kuan Yew was therefore able to inherit Lim Chin Siong mass base and went on to make a complete sweep of the general election in 1959 which propelled him to the post of prime minister. For the sacrifices that civil servants like us made through the baptism of fire to make it possible for mercenary politicians like Lee Hsien Loong and his greedy cohorts to wallow in luxuries of their high office we were rewarded with a poverty-level pension. When the cost of living began to spike from time to time our pensions remained stagnant. I approached Lee Hsien Loong to consider a raise in our pensions so that it will ease our burden of living on a starvation subsistence level. You will never believe the kind of charitable response that was hurled at us. "You have served your purpose. What you get is enough. We are waiting for you to die" The minister who said it was Dr. Richard Hu who was then the Finance Minister to the President and Vice-President of the Pensioners' Association who saw him to raise our pensions. But Lee Hsien Loong endorsed it tacitly. You think they are human to make such callous remarks? And they were pocketing millions of people's money to enrich themselves and wallow in luxuries. Lee Hsien Loong gives the impression that he is generous and compassionate in giving subsidies to the people ostensibly to lighten their burden during the Covid 19 and the considerable rise in the cost of living. What he is actually paying the people is the people's money like they are pocketing millions of people's money. Will there be a salvation in the foreseeable future? You have an Opposition leader who is a joker and with his antics you think he will be able to cause an upset to the PAP? The status quo will stay for a considerable time. And the people may need the blessing of God.   Yoong Siew Wah * The author was the Director of Singapore’s Internal Security Department (ISD) from 1971 to 1974. He was Director of the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) in the 1960s, and had a distinguished career in the Singapore Special Branch in the 1950s.      Read More →

19 years living in NYC as an openly gay man has not erased my memory of the shame and fear of hiding my true self in Singapore. I can still remember visiting a gay bar in Chinatown, not at night when it was open, but in the day when I could check it out without being seen. I was hiding in broad daylight. What was I afraid of? I was a teacher, then a vice-principal of a secondary school. What if a student or, worse, a parent had spotted me entering the bar? The scandal would have been humiliating, and there was the possibility of losing my job. It was not just a matter of being caught, however; it was about living an inauthentic life, day in, day out. There I was, teaching students to speak and write, telling parents how to help their children flourish, and I was evasive and stunted. This and other memories came back when I read that the Singapore government intends to abolish 377A, the law that criminalizes sex between men, but also to amend the constitution to ensure that the legal definition of marriage as between one man and one woman cannot be challenged in the courts. The intention is problematic on many different levels, as the journalist Kirsten Han clearly lays them out. Statements from various ministries reinforced the homophobic status quo. The Ministry of Education, my former boss, explained that "Our education policies and curriculum will remain anchored on Singapore's prevailing family values and social norms, which the majority of Singaporeans want to uphold. These include the family as the cornerstone of our social fabric, and marriage between a man and a woman." The statement completely dismisses LGBTQ families as families. Furthermore, although sexuality education in schools "will remain secular" (no mention of being scientific), it will also be "sensitive to the multiracial and multireligious make-up of our society," which of course allows religious prejudices to prevail over what is supposedly secular. The statement makes no mention of the status of LGBTQ teachers, whether they will be honored and supported in their work, or even assured of job and fair treatment. Instead, the Ministry warns against "advocacy and contestation on socially divisive issues," even though "Singapore's family and social norms must continue to be determined by Singaporeans." If there is no peaceful advocacy and contestation in schools, how can Singaporeans determine for themselves what is right or wrong, instead of following authority blindly? What students, and adults, need to learn is to develop evidence-based arguments logically, surface hidden assumptions, and be open to changing one's mind when given good reasons for doing so. The MOE statement is, in fact, anti-education. It maintains the silence and the shame around being different.     Jee Leong Koh          Read More →