A rebuttal of Professor Balding’s rebuttal
I refer to Balding’s article (LINK) in which he rebutted my earlier article (LINK) so this piece is a rebuttal of a rebuttal of a rebuttal, so to speak. To recap: Balding posted 3 graphs in his blog with no commentary but with the provocative title “The Problem with Temasek in 3 Pictures – No words used or are necessary”....
Prof Balding rebuts Nonsense: The Implications of ‘Zero or Nominal Cost’
Dr Christopher Balding I was recently notified of a rebuttal ('Rebutting Christopher Balding – Why Temasek can have 17% return') to some of my writings and specifically attempting to clarify how Temasek Holdings has earned 17% annually since 1974 as they claim. The author claims that Temasek investment returns are entirely...
Prof Balding explains SIA’s accounting on recent sale of its Virgin Atlantic stake
As I have written about the discrepancy between inflows into Singaporean public assets, reported earnings, and then the amount they claim as assets under management, the question of how to reconcile these divergent numbers arises. There are numerous reasons for the difference between earnings, inflows, and assets under...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- NUS AND NTU TOP RANK GLOBALLY on The fate of Singapore
- History Repeats on Trump: Raging against The Machine
- Send to milkyway on China’s 1/4 million students rode 50km to another city for breakfast
- Singaporeans R Free Riders on China’s 1/4 million students rode 50km to another city for breakfast
- Singaporeans R Free Riders on Perception is everything
|
|